Who Is 3Chi? A Brand File on the Delta-8 Pioneer

The company widely credited with starting the hemp delta-8 boom makes its own product in an audited GMP lab and hides almost nothing about who runs it — but its workplace reviews and customer ratings tell a rockier story. Here's the receipts-first reality.

By The Kind Buds Desk · 11 min read · Updated 2026-06-28

B80/100

Kind Buds Brand Transparency Score

A pioneer that makes its own product in an audited GMP lab and is fully open about who's behind it — held back by weak workplace reviews and middling customer ratings.

An opinion grade from our transparent 6-pillar methodology, built on publicly sourced facts.

Lab Testing & Safety21/25

Batch-specific COAs from named ISO-accredited labs; full contaminant panel not uniformly confirmed.

Manufacturing Transparency15/15

Makes its own product in a 112,000 sq-ft facility with a third-party-audited cGMP certification (98%).

Sourcing & Ingredients9/15

US hemp stated, but specific grow states/farms not disclosed on its own pages.

Ownership & Funding14/15

Named founder, traceable entity, bootstrapped with no outside investors disclosed.

People & Operations9/15

~300–350 US employees, but Glassdoor 1.8 and Indeed 1.9 drag this down.

Reputation & Record12/15

Clean regulatory record; only lawsuit is as a plaintiff. Trustpilot ~2.5 is mixed.

If you've ever bought a delta-8 gummy, there's a decent chance the company that made the category possible is 3Chi. It's widely credited with bringing hemp-derived delta-8 THC to market around 2019, and it grew from a one-man operation into one of the biggest names in the hemp-cannabinoid space. That history buys a brand goodwill — but goodwill isn't transparency, so we ran 3Chi through the same six-pillar Brand Transparency Score we use on everyone.

The short version, up top: 3Chi earns a B (80/100) in our view, and it's a genuinely revealing grade. The company is unusually open about the things that matter most for what goes in your body — it makes its own product in a facility with a real, third-party-audited GMP certification, posts batch-specific lab results from named accredited labs, and puts a real, named founder out front. What drags it down isn't secrecy; it's a rough workplace reputation and middling customer ratings. This is the receipts-first reality, good and bad, every claim from the public record.

The short version

  • Our grade: B (80/100). Strong where it counts most — manufacturing and testing — with real weak spots in workplace and customer reputation.
  • They make their own product. 3Chi manufactures in-house in a ~112,000 sq-ft facility and holds a third-party-audited cGMP certification (a 98% audit score) — rare, verifiable transparency.
  • Real founder, traceable company, no outside money. Founder/CEO Justin Journay is public (he's even testified to a state legislature); the entity is 3C, LLC; and it appears bootstrapped with no disclosed outside investors.
  • The weak spot is people, not product. Glassdoor (~1.8) and Indeed (~1.9) ratings are poor, and Trustpilot sits around 2.5 — mostly shipping and support complaints, not safety.
  • Two myths debunked: 3Chi did not receive a 2022 FDA warning letter (that was a different company, 'Delta 8 Hemp'), and it was not 'founded in 2003.'
What the public record shows
Legal entity3C, LLC d/b/a 3CHI (manufacturing affiliate: 3C Labs LLC)
Founded2018–2019 (delta-8 breakthrough ~Sept 2019)
Founder / CEOJustin Journay
HQFishers / Carmel, Indiana
Makes its own product?Yes — in-house, ~112,000 sq-ft facility
GMPThird-party-audited cGMP cert (CSQ; 98% audit)
Lab testingBatch-specific COAs; named ISO labs (ACS, Avazyme, others)
FundingBootstrapped; no outside investors disclosed
Employees~300–350 (Indiana); Glassdoor ~1.8
FDA action / recallsNone found

3Chi at a glance — the verified facts

The short version

3Chi is one of the most transparent hemp brands we've examined on the questions that decide what's in your body — and one of the least flattering when you look at how it's reviewed as a workplace and a store. That split is the whole story, and it's why a famous pioneer lands at a B rather than an A.

Where it earns its points: it actually manufactures its own products (no mystery white-label partner), in a facility with a verifiable, third-party-audited GMP certification; it posts batch-specific Certificates of Analysis from named, accredited labs; and it's fully traceable to a real founder and a real legal entity. Where it loses them: its Glassdoor and Indeed ratings are poor, its Trustpilot score is mediocre, and — like nearly every hemp brand — it doesn't name the farms its hemp comes from. None of the negatives are safety scandals. They're the ordinary frictions of a company that scaled fast.

Who's behind it

The brand "3Chi" is operated by 3C, LLC (its manufacturing arm trades as 3C Labs LLC) — confirmed in the caption of its own federal lawsuit. The founder and CEO is Justin Journay, a public figure who has gone as far as testifying before a state legislative committee on hemp policy. That matters: a real, named, on-the-record founder is a transparency signal that a surprising number of hemp brands can't match.

3Chi describes Journay as a "biochemist with 15 years of product formulation experience" who developed a method to make delta-8 from hemp around 2019. We'll be precise here, because precision is the point: that biographical credential traces to 3Chi's own materials, and we found no independent record (a degree, a prior employer) to verify the specific "biochemist" credential. We're not disputing it — we're flagging that it's company-stated, not independently confirmed. The company is headquartered in the Indianapolis area (Fishers/Carmel, Indiana). Its exact state of incorporation we list as not conclusively verified from a primary filing; we'd rather say that than print a guess.

On the "founded in 2003" claim: some AI-generated and aggregator summaries float a 2003 founding date. The public product history (the delta-8 breakthrough dates to 2019, and the entity's registration to 2019) contradicts it. We treat 2018–2019 as the real founding window and the 2003 figure as unverified.

Do they actually make it? (This is 3Chi's strongest pillar)

The single most important question we ask any brand is whether it makes its own product or just slaps a label on someone else's — and whether it'll tell you. Plenty of "brands" are a marketing team reselling a contract manufacturer's gummy. 3Chi is not. It manufactures in-house, in a facility it describes as roughly 112,000 square feet, and says it controls the process "from molecule to final product."

More importantly, that claim is verifiable. 3Chi holds a cGMP certification through CSQ (Cannabis Safety & Quality), and the most recent audit — conducted by a third-party auditor (ASI Food Safety) and benchmarked to the FDA's dietary-supplement and food rules — reportedly scored 98%, with a certificate number on record. A self-proclaimed "GMP facility" is marketing; a third-party-audited certificate you can point to is evidence. This is the gold standard for the manufacturing pillar, and 3Chi clears it. (The company's claim that it's the "only" such facility in its state is a press-release superlative we did not independently verify, and we don't score it.)

What's in it, and how do you know? (Sourcing & lab testing)

Lab testing is where the rubber meets the road for converted cannabinoids like delta-8, which can carry residual solvents or unreacted reagents if made carelessly. 3Chi publishes batch-specific Certificates of Analysis — downloadable PDFs organized by dated batch code — and describes a two-step process: an internal lab plus an ISO-accredited third-party lab. The labs on its COAs are named and real (ACS Laboratory, Avazyme, North Coast Analytical, and others), which is meaningfully better disclosure than the "trust us, it's tested" screenshots many competitors post.

The honest caveat: while 3Chi references "full panel" testing, we could not confirm that every posted COA carries a complete contaminant panel (potency + pesticides + heavy metals + residual solvents + microbials) — some appear potency-focused by filename. So we credit it strongly but not perfectly. On sourcing, 3Chi states its products are made from US hemp, but — like most of the industry — it does not name the specific farms or states on its own pages. That omission costs sourcing points across the board; it isn't unique to 3Chi, but our job is to score what's disclosed.

Who funds it (and the question everyone asks)

Readers worry, fairly, about who's quietly bankrolling the companies they buy from. Here's what the record shows for 3Chi: it appears to be privately held and bootstrapped. Crunchbase lists no funding rounds and no outside investors, and a roughly $1.5M expansion was self-funded (tied to publicly reported state job-creation incentives) — a pattern consistent with a founder-owned company that didn't take venture money.

On foreign or "hostile" funding: we searched specifically and found no credible source documenting foreign ownership or funding of 3Chi — and, per our method, that means we report exactly that and do not insinuate otherwise. The absence of disclosed outside capital is itself the finding. We will never invent a backer we can't source.

The people and the workplace (the weak spot)

This is where the shine comes off. 3Chi grew fast — to roughly 300–350 employees (as of 2022), concentrated in the Indianapolis area, with public plans to hire hundreds more. That's real US-based operation, and we credit it. But the people who work there don't rate it well: its Glassdoor sits around 1.8/5 (with only about 17% recommending it) and Indeed around 1.9/5. We weight these by review volume so a tiny sample can't swing a score, and even so, these are poor numbers.

We don't have a public breakdown of employees versus contractors, and we found no evidence of overseas labor (operations appear domestic). The takeaway isn't a scandal — it's that a company can be excellent at manufacturing and testing while its own workforce reviews it harshly, and you deserve to see both.

The record: courts, regulators, and customers

Regulators: we found no FDA warning letter, no recall, and no agency action against 3Chi. This is worth stating plainly because a persistent myth says 3Chi got an FDA delta-8 letter in 2022 — it did not. The 2022 letters went to other companies; one of them was named "Delta 8 Hemp," a name collision that gets misattributed to 3Chi. We flag it precisely so the mistake stops spreading.

Courts: the notable lawsuit involving 3Chi has 3Chi as the plaintiff — it (with industry partners) sued its state's attorney general over whether delta-8 is legal, a policy fight, not misconduct. That case was dismissed in 2025 on jurisdictional grounds. We found no material litigation alleging wrongdoing by the company.

Customers: here the picture is mixed. Its BBB rating is an A (though not BBB-accredited) with relatively few complaints for its size, but its Trustpilot sits around 2.5/5 on a low-but-real volume, with recurring gripes about shipping delays, a shipping fee, and occasional product issues — alongside genuine praise for specific products and for refunds being honored. On Reddit's delta-8 community it's generally regarded as an established, reputable brand rather than a fly-by-night. We average the platforms rather than cherry-pick.

The bottom line

In our view, 3Chi is a brand you can buy from with your eyes open — and that's the highest compliment our method pays, because it means you can actually verify the things that matter. It makes its own product, it has the audited GMP paperwork to back that up, it posts real batch lab results from named labs, and it's run by a named founder with no hidden money behind him. For the core question — "what am I putting in my body, and who actually made it?" — 3Chi answers more completely than most of the industry.

The honest deductions are about everything around the product: it won't tell you which farms grow its hemp, its own employees rate it poorly, and its customer ratings are middling on shipping and service. None of that is a safety red flag; all of it is fair to know before you buy. A solid B, and a good example of why a transparency score isn't the same as a popularity contest. If you want to see how we arrived at every point, the methodology is fully public.

Questions, answered

Is 3Chi a legit, safe brand?

By the things you can actually verify, yes — and that's the point. 3Chi manufactures its own products in a facility with a third-party-audited cGMP certification, and it posts batch-specific lab results from named, accredited labs, which is the gold standard for knowing what's in a hemp product. We give it a B (80/100). Its weaknesses are about workplace reviews and customer-service ratings, not product safety. As always, verify the current COA for the specific batch you buy.

Did 3Chi get an FDA warning letter?

No. This is a persistent myth. The FDA's 2022 delta-8 warning letters went to other companies — one of which was named 'Delta 8 Hemp,' a name collision that gets misattributed to 3Chi. We found no FDA warning letter, recall, or agency action against 3Chi. The only notable lawsuit involving the company has 3Chi as the plaintiff, suing its state's attorney general over delta-8's legal status.

Does 3Chi make its own products or white-label them?

3Chi manufactures in-house. It operates a facility it describes as roughly 112,000 square feet, controls production 'from molecule to final product,' and — crucially — holds a third-party-audited cGMP certification (a recent audit reportedly scored 98%). That's a verifiable claim, not just marketing, and it's the strongest part of its transparency profile. Many hemp 'brands' simply resell a contract manufacturer's product; 3Chi does not.

Who owns and funds 3Chi?

3Chi is operated by 3C, LLC and was founded by Justin Journay, who remains its public CEO. The public record indicates it's privately held and bootstrapped — Crunchbase shows no outside investors, and a roughly $1.5M expansion was self-funded alongside reported state job-creation incentives. We found no credible source documenting any foreign ownership or funding, and per our method we report that absence rather than speculate about it.

Why isn't 3Chi an A if it's so transparent on testing?

Because our score covers more than the product. 3Chi is excellent on manufacturing and ownership transparency, and strong on lab testing, but it loses points on sourcing (it doesn't name its hemp farms or states), on workplace reputation (Glassdoor ~1.8, Indeed ~1.9), and on mixed customer ratings (Trustpilot ~2.5). A B reflects a company that's open and capable on what's in the product, with real friction in how it's run and reviewed. The full pillar-by-pillar breakdown is shown above.

How did you research this, and is it fair to 3Chi?

Every factual claim here comes from a public source — 3Chi's own site and COAs, court records, the FDA database, BBB, Glassdoor and Indeed, Crunchbase, and press reporting. Conclusions and the score are our opinion, based on our published methodology. Where we couldn't verify something (like the exact incorporation state or whether every COA is full-panel), we say so rather than guess, and we actively debunked two myths (the FDA letter and the 2003 founding date) in 3Chi's favor. If 3Chi can show us something we got wrong, we'll correct it — see the notice at the foot of this page.