Who Is Galaxy Treats? A Brand File on the 'Moon Babies' Maker
A colorful, candy-styled THC-gummy brand with a genuinely good lab habit and a clean regulatory record — wrapped around a company that won't tell you its legal name, where it's made, or who's on the team. Popular and accountable on testing; a black box almost everywhere else.
By The Kind Buds Desk · 10 min read · Updated 2026-06-28
Kind Buds Brand Transparency Score
Better lab transparency than its candy branding suggests — named, accredited labs and a clean enforcement record — but a wall of undisclosed basics (no legal entity, no facility, no GMP, no sourcing, no headcount) keeps it at a D.
An opinion grade from our transparent 6-pillar methodology, built on publicly sourced facts.
A real strength: COAs are published and the testing labs are named and accredited (ACS Laboratory is ISO-17025/DEA-registered), with a full panel on the gummy report we examined — but there's no batch/QR lookup to tie a package to its COA, and panel completeness varies by product.
Almost entirely undisclosed — 'crafted in the USA' is the extent of it. No named facility, no in-house-vs-co-pack answer, no GMP/cGMP claim, no FDA registration.
'Hemp-derived' is asserted, but the hemp's origin and the cannabinoid derivation process are not disclosed.
The exact legal entity is NOT disclosed, but the operator (Streamline Group) and a named founder (Bryan Garrison) are public, and no outside funding is reported.
No Galaxy-Treats-specific headcount or Glassdoor exists; only parent-company-level estimates and a Henderson, NV base are available.
Genuinely clean: no recalls, no lawsuits naming the brand, and verifiably NOT named in the 2023 or 2024 FDA/FTC delta-8 sweeps — offset by candy-styled branding that invites category-wide youth-appeal scrutiny and some subscription complaints.
Galaxy Treats is one of the more recognizable faces of the hemp-THC gummy boom — "Moon Babies" delta-8 gummies, "Orbital" delta-9 lines, sour belts, vapes, and THCa flower, all wrapped in bright, retro-space, candy-store branding. It's popular, widely stocked in smoke shops, and well-rated by customers. We ran it through our six-pillar Brand Transparency Score and it lands at a D (58/100) — a grade that comes with a genuine surprise in the brand's favor and a real warning behind it.
The surprise: for a candy-styled brand, Galaxy Treats actually does the lab work better than most — it names its testing labs, at least one of which is a legitimate ISO-accredited, DEA-registered facility, and posts full-panel reports. The warning: almost everything else about the company is a blank. It won't tell you its legal entity name, where its products are manufactured, whether it follows any quality standard, where its hemp comes from, or how many people work there. So you can verify the test on the gummy more easily than you can verify the company that made it. Here's the receipts-first reality — including the name-collisions we had to clear to avoid getting it wrong.
The short version
- Our grade: D (58/100). Strong on lab testing, opaque on nearly everything else.
- The real positive: named, accredited labs. Galaxy Treats posts COAs that name the testing lab (ACS Laboratory is ISO-17025-accredited and DEA-registered), with a full panel on the gummy report we reviewed — better than its candy branding implies.
- The real problem: a wall of blanks. No disclosed legal entity, no named manufacturing facility, no GMP claim, no hemp source, and no company-specific headcount — the corporate basics are simply missing.
- What IS known about ownership: it's operated within Streamline Group's brand portfolio and was founded by a named, public founder (Bryan Garrison) — partial credit where most of the cabinet is bare.
- The record is clean. No recalls, no lawsuits naming the brand, and — verified — NOT named in the 2023 or 2024 FDA/FTC delta-8 'copycat candy' sweeps, despite category-wide scrutiny of candy-style packaging.
| What the public record shows | |
|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not publicly disclosed (operates as a trade name only) |
| Operator / parent | Streamline Group (brand portfolio) |
| Founder | Bryan Garrison (named, public) |
| HQ | Henderson, NV (parent in Long Beach, CA) |
| Makes its own product? | Not disclosed — no facility or GMP claim |
| Lab testing | COAs posted; labs named (ACS Laboratory, ISO-17025); no batch/QR lookup |
| Hemp source | Not disclosed ('hemp-derived' only) |
| Funding | No outside funding reported |
| FDA delta-8 sweeps | NOT named in 2023 or 2024 rounds (verified) |
| Recalls / lawsuits | None found naming the brand |
Galaxy Treats at a glance — the verified facts
The short version
Galaxy Treats is a brand you can vet on the product but not on the company. Its lab transparency is genuinely a strength — named, accredited labs and full-panel reports — and its regulatory record is clean. But the company behind the gummies is unusually hard to pin down: no disclosed legal entity, no named factory, no quality certification, no hemp origin, no headcount. Our score rewards what you can verify, and Galaxy Treats lets you verify the test result while withholding almost everything about who made it.
This is also a file where getting the facts right meant not printing several tempting ones — there are look-alike companies and a copycat domain that could easily lead to a false statement. We'll flag those explicitly, because being careful is the point.
Who's behind it? (A named founder, but no named entity)
Here's the unusual split. Galaxy Treats does not disclose its exact legal entity — its site operates under the trade name "Galaxy Treats" with no LLC or Inc. named in its terms. But it's not anonymous, either: the brand is publicly operated within Streamline Group's portfolio (a Long Beach, CA consumer-brands company that lists Galaxy Treats alongside several other labels), wholesale inquiries route through Streamline, and the brand was founded by a named, public person — Bryan Garrison, who later joined Streamline as a VP. So you can find the founder and the operator; you just can't find the registered company.
Lab testing — the candy brand's real strength
This is where Galaxy Treats genuinely outperforms its bubblegum image, and it's the main reason this is a D and not lower:
- COAs are published and the labs are named. Galaxy Treats posts Certificates of Analysis and — unlike many brands — the testing lab is identified on the report. Its gummy line is tested by ACS Laboratory, a Florida lab that is ISO/IEC 17025-accredited and DEA-registered; some flower is tested by a San Diego lab. Named, accredited labs are exactly what makes a COA worth anything.
- The gummy panel is full. The delta-8 gummy COA we examined showed a complete panel — potency, heavy metals, mycotoxins, pesticides, residual solvents, and microbials — all passing.
Manufacturing and sourcing — the blanks
This is where Galaxy Treats goes dark. On manufacturing, the site says products are "crafted in the USA," and that's essentially the entire disclosure: no named facility, no statement of whether it makes its own product or uses a co-packer, no GMP or cGMP claim, and no FDA facility registration we could find. For something you eat, "made in the USA, somewhere, somehow" is a thin assurance.
On sourcing, it's the same pattern: the products are described as "hemp-derived," but the hemp's origin (farm or state) and the cannabinoid derivation process aren't disclosed. None of this means the product is unsafe — the lab panels are the reassuring part — but our score measures what you can verify about the supply chain, and here the answer is very little.
The record: clean, and we checked carefully
Galaxy Treats' actual track record is one of its better features, and because the candy-style branding invites suspicion, we verified the negatives rather than assuming them:
- Not named in the FDA/FTC delta-8 sweeps. We checked the named recipients of both the 2023 and 2024 FDA/FTC "copycat candy" delta-8 enforcement rounds — Galaxy Treats is not on either list. (One of those rounds did name other brands you'll see in these files, which is exactly why we verify rather than guess.)
- No recalls, no lawsuits naming the brand. We found no product recalls and no litigation naming Galaxy Treats the hemp brand. (Again: "Galaxy Gas," the nitrous company with lawsuits, is a different business.)
- Customers like it. Product ratings are strong (a large on-store review base around 4.9 stars), with the usual caveats that on-site and affiliate reviews aren't independently audited.
The bottom line
In our view, Galaxy Treats is a well-tested product from a deliberately under-disclosed company. The lab work is real and better than the candy aesthetic suggests, and the regulatory record is genuinely clean — both of which we credit. But if you want to know who legally makes your gummies, in what kind of facility, to what standard, from whose hemp, the brand answers almost none of it. That gap between "we'll show you the test" and "we won't show you the company" is exactly what a D captures.
If you buy Galaxy Treats, lean on the COA for your product type (the labs are named and accredited, which is the part that matters), accept that you can't batch-match it to the exact bag, and treat the missing corporate details as a real, if not safety-disqualifying, limitation. A D (58/100) — fun, popular, well-tested, and oddly faceless. The full methodology shows every point; if Galaxy Treats names its entity, its facility, and its sourcing, this score moves up fast (see the notice below).
Questions, answered
Is Galaxy Treats legit?
On the product side, largely yes: Galaxy Treats posts Certificates of Analysis that name accredited testing labs (ACS Laboratory is ISO-17025-accredited and DEA-registered), with a full panel on the gummy report we reviewed, and it has a clean record — no recalls, no lawsuits naming the brand, and it was NOT named in the 2023 or 2024 FDA/FTC delta-8 sweeps. We grade it a D (58/100), but that's about company transparency, not a safety finding: it doesn't disclose its legal entity, its manufacturing facility, any quality certification, its hemp source, or its headcount. Well-tested product; very opaque company.
Who owns Galaxy Treats?
Galaxy Treats doesn't publicly disclose its exact legal entity — its site operates under the trade name only. What is public: the brand is operated within Streamline Group's portfolio (a Long Beach, CA consumer-brands company), and it was founded by a named, public founder, Bryan Garrison, who later became a VP at Streamline. Importantly, do not trust a name you may see on a BBB profile tied to a hyphenated 'galaxy-treats.com' site — that's a separate copycat domain naming a different operator, not the real brand's verified entity. We found no outside funding reported. So: a known operator and founder, but no disclosed registered company.
Are Galaxy Treats lab tests trustworthy?
They're a genuine strength. Galaxy Treats publishes COAs and — unlike many brands — names the testing lab on the report. Its gummies are tested by ACS Laboratory, which is ISO/IEC 17025-accredited and DEA-registered, and the delta-8 gummy COA we examined showed a full panel (potency, heavy metals, mycotoxins, pesticides, solvents, microbials), all passing. The two limits: there's no searchable batch database or package QR code, so you can't reliably match a specific package to its exact report, and panel completeness varies by product (a flower report we saw was narrower than the gummy panel). Use the COA for your product type, and pick products where the full panel is shown.
Has Galaxy Treats been in any FDA or legal trouble?
Not that we could find for the actual brand — and we checked carefully because the category gets a lot of scrutiny. Galaxy Treats was NOT named in either the 2023 or 2024 FDA/FTC delta-8 'copycat candy' enforcement rounds, and we found no recalls or lawsuits naming the hemp brand. Two cautions to avoid confusion: 'Galaxy Gas' is an unrelated nitrous-oxide company that has its own litigation (not Galaxy Treats'), and a hyphenated 'galaxy-treats.com' copycat domain has a separate BBB profile. The honest asterisk is the candy-style branding ('Moon Babies,' sour belts), which sits in the category regulators have criticized for youth appeal — though Galaxy Treats specifically hasn't been named in an action over it.
Where are Galaxy Treats products made?
That's one of the brand's biggest transparency gaps. The site says products are 'crafted in the USA,' but it doesn't name a manufacturing facility, doesn't say whether it makes its own products or uses a co-packer, makes no GMP or cGMP claim, and we found no FDA facility registration. Its hemp source (farm or state) and the cannabinoid derivation process also aren't disclosed. None of this indicates the product is unsafe — the named-lab COAs are the reassuring part — but if knowing exactly where and how your edibles are manufactured matters to you, Galaxy Treats doesn't currently provide it.
How did you research this, and is it fair to Galaxy Treats?
Every claim is from a public source — Galaxy Treats' own site and lab pages, its published COAs and the labs' accreditation records, Streamline Group's portfolio disclosures, and the FDA/FTC enforcement releases. We credited the real strengths (named accredited labs, a full gummy panel, a clean enforcement record) and were deliberately careful with the traps: we did NOT publish an unverified legal-entity name that actually belongs to a copycat domain, we did NOT attribute unrelated 'Galaxy Gas' litigation to it, and we left out a single-source, unproven allegation about a third-party lab. We verified it was absent from the delta-8 sweeps rather than assuming. If Galaxy Treats names its entity, facility, and sourcing, we'll update the file — see the notice at the foot of this page.