Who Is Urb? The Hemp Brand You Can Audit on the SEC's Website
Urb is unusual in this category: it's owned by a publicly traded company, so its finances, ownership, leadership pay, and lawsuits are all filed with the SEC. That transparency is real — and it also lets you read, in the company's own words, a going-concern warning and a settled lawsuit over mislabeled potency.
By The Kind Buds Desk · 12 min read · Updated 2026-06-28
Kind Buds Brand Transparency Score
The most ownership-transparent brand we've scored — a wholly-owned subsidiary of a public, SEC-reporting company, with strong COA access — pulled back to a C by a self-contradictory sourcing story, an unnamed lab on the COAs, and a settled class action over delta-9 potency labeling.
An opinion grade from our transparent 6-pillar methodology, built on publicly sourced facts.
Strong COA access — a searchable portal, per-product links, and a QR code on every package — but the testing lab is named only inside the PDFs, and a settled class action alleged delta-9 potency was underreported.
SEC filings disclose in-house assembly in a named Kenosha facility (though it buys and does not extract its own cannabinoids), plus a B2B white-label business. No GMP/ISO certification is claimed.
The brand's own pages contradict each other on flower sourcing (Oregon outdoor vs. indoor US), and the cannabinoid raw-material suppliers aren't named.
Best in the category: a wholly-owned subsidiary of a public company (OTCQB), so ownership, deal terms, executive equity, and audited financials are all in SEC EDGAR — including a frank going-concern disclosure.
Employee count (~100) and named, equity-holding leadership are disclosed in filings; BBB A+ and accredited. Workplace reviews are mixed and partly muddied by name collisions.
Litigation is disclosed in filings: a delta-9 underreporting class action settled with no admission, a RICO claim dismissed (plaintiff appealing), and an old e-liquid FDA letter resolved. No recalls.
Urb — full name Urb Finest Flowers — is a big, smoke-shop-ubiquitous hemp brand: delta-8, delta-9, THCA, and a long alphabet of minor cannabinoids across gummies, vapes, drinks, and flower. But the most important fact about Urb isn't on its product pages. It's in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's database. Urb is a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly traded company, which means its ownership, its finances, its executives' pay, and its lawsuits are all filed, audited, and public in a way almost no other brand in these files can match. We ran it through our six-pillar Brand Transparency Score and it lands at a C (70/100).
That public-company status is genuinely the headline, and it's why Urb scores near the top on ownership transparency — you can audit this brand in a way you simply can't audit a private LLC that won't name its founders. But the same filings that prove the transparency also let you read the hard parts in the company's own words: a blunt going-concern warning tied to looming federal hemp law, and a settled class action alleging its delta-9 potency was underreported. Add a sourcing story that contradicts itself on the brand's own website, and you get a brand that's admirably open about who it is — and honest, by necessity, about its problems. Here's the receipts-first reality.
The short version
- Our grade: C (70/100). Exceptional ownership transparency, dragged down by sourcing inconsistencies and a settled potency-labeling lawsuit.
- The standout positive: you can audit it. Urb's parent is a public, SEC-reporting company, so ownership, deal terms, executive equity, audited financials, and litigation are all in EDGAR — the strongest ownership transparency we've scored.
- Lab access is strong, lab name isn't. Urb has a searchable COA portal and a QR code on every package, but the testing lab is identified only inside the report PDFs, not stated plainly.
- The sourcing story contradicts itself. Urb's own pages variously call its flower Oregon-grown outdoor and indoor-grown US — and the cannabinoid raw-material suppliers aren't named.
- Read the filings' hard parts. A class action alleging underreported delta-9 potency settled with no admission of liability, and the parent's latest annual report carries a going-concern warning tied to a federal hemp ban set for late 2026.
| What the public record shows | |
|---|---|
| Brand | Urb / Urb Finest Flowers (a d/b/a, not a separate entity) |
| Operating entity | Lifted Liquids, Inc., d/b/a Lifted Made |
| Parent | LFTD Partners Inc. — publicly traded (OTCQB) |
| Leadership | Nicholas Warrender (subsidiary CEO; ~26% of parent) |
| HQ / operations | Kenosha, WI (operations); FL (registrant office) |
| Makes its own product? | In-house assembly in Kenosha; buys, doesn't extract, cannabinoids |
| Lab testing | Searchable COA portal + QR on packaging; lab named in PDFs only |
| Financials | Public: FY net sales ~$37M; net loss; going-concern noted |
| BBB rating | A+ (accredited) |
| Notable legal | Delta-9 potency class action (settled, no admission); RICO claim dismissed, on appeal |
Urb at a glance — the verified facts
The short version
Urb is the rare hemp brand you can fact-check on a government website. Because its parent is a publicly traded, SEC-reporting company, the things we usually have to dig for — who owns it, how it's doing financially, what its executives are paid, what it's being sued over — are all filed and audited. That's a real, structural transparency advantage, and we score it accordingly.
But transparency cuts both ways: the same filings disclose a going-concern warning and a settled lawsuit over potency labeling, and the brand's own website can't keep its sourcing story straight. So Urb is a C — not because it hides things, but because what it openly discloses includes real problems, and a couple of the basics (a named lab, a consistent sourcing claim) still aren't nailed down.
Who's behind it? (A public company — verifiably)
The brand "Urb Finest Flowers" is a trade name. The company that actually makes and sells it is Lifted Liquids, Inc. (which also operates as Lifted Made), and Lifted is a wholly-owned subsidiary of LFTD Partners Inc., a publicly traded company that files reports with the SEC (it trades on the OTCQB market). That corporate chain is documented in the parent's annual reports, down to the original 2020 acquisition terms.
Who makes it, and where
Here the filings are refreshingly specific. Lifted discloses that it assembles and formulates finished goods in-house at a named facility in Kenosha, Wisconsin (a building it owns, plus additional leased space), and that it also runs a B2B white-label business manufacturing products for other brands. One honest nuance, straight from the 10-K: Lifted states it does not grow hemp or extract cannabinoids itself — it buys those raw inputs and formulates the finished products. We flag that because the brand's consumer-facing marketing sometimes implies "all our own manufacturing," which is true for assembly but not for extraction.
What's missing is a quality certification: we found no GMP, cGMP, or ISO claim, and no FDA facility registration on record. So Urb tells you where it's made and by whom — better than most — but doesn't back it with a named manufacturing standard.
Lab testing — great access, one gap
On lab transparency, Urb is one of the stronger brands here on access. It runs a searchable COA portal (coa.urb.shop), links reports from products, and prints a QR code on every package so you can pull the batch report at the shelf. It says reports cover the full slate — potency, heavy metals, pesticides, residual solvents, microbials, and mycotoxins. That infrastructure is genuinely good and beats most of the category.
- The gap: the testing laboratory is identified only inside the individual COA PDFs, not stated plainly on the site, which describes "a certified third-party lab." Naming your accredited lab up front is a stronger signal than burying it in the document.
- The asterisk: a class action (more below) alleged that the delta-9 THC content in some Urb vapes was underreported versus the label — i.e., the labeling, not the access, was the issue. It settled with no admission of liability, but it's a reminder that good COA access and accurate labeling are two different things.
The sourcing story doesn't match itself
This is Urb's weakest pillar, and it's self-inflicted. The brand's own pages contradict each other on where the flower comes from: a FAQ describes it as Oregon-grown, outdoor, sun-grown, while a product collection page describes American-grown flower via "advanced indoor methods." Outdoor sun-grown in Oregon and indoor cultivation are not the same thing, and a buyer can't tell which is true. On the cannabinoid side, the raw-material suppliers aren't named (the site references a generic "certified" oil), so the derivation chain is opaque.
None of this implies the product is unsafe. But sourcing transparency means telling a consistent, verifiable story about what's in the bottle and where it came from, and on its own website Urb tells two different ones. That's a straightforward, fixable miss — and until it's fixed, it costs real points.
The record — disclosed, because it has to be
Because Urb's parent reports to the SEC, its litigation and risks are laid out in its filings — which is both a transparency credit and a window into real problems:
- Delta-9 potency class action — settled. A federal class action alleged that delta-9 THC in certain Urb vapes was underreported relative to the label. Per the parent's filings, it settled in early 2026 with no admission of liability (a modest reported sum). Allegations, not an adjudicated finding — but a settled one.
- RICO/consumer suit — dismissed, on appeal. A separate suit naming Lifted and its executives had its RICO claim dismissed with prejudice and the case dismissed in early 2026; the plaintiff has appealed, so it's live. Again, unproven allegations.
- An old FDA letter — resolved. Back in 2018, the predecessor entity received an FDA warning letter about a child-appealing e-liquid (a tobacco-vape matter, not its current hemp line), resolved via corrective action. Importantly, Urb/Lifted was not named in the widely-reported 2023 FDA/FTC delta-8 "copycat" sweep — we checked the release, and attributing that to Urb would be wrong.
On the plus side, Urb's parent holds a BBB A+ rating and is accredited, with very few complaints on file. Workplace reviews are mixed, but partly muddied by name collisions (an unrelated "URB Cannabis" dispensary chain in Michigan corrupts the search results), so we weight them lightly.
The bottom line
In our view, Urb is the most auditable brand we've scored — and a C is what honest auditability looks like when the books include real problems. You can verify who owns it, how it's doing, and what it's been sued over, because it's a public company's subsidiary. That's a meaningful advantage over the private brands that simply ask for your trust. But the same openness reveals a settled potency-labeling suit and a going-concern warning, and the brand still can't tell a consistent sourcing story or name its lab up front. Transparent about the big things, sloppy on a couple of basics.
If you buy Urb, you actually can do your homework: pull the batch COA from the QR code, and read the parent's latest SEC filings if you want the full financial and legal picture — a level of due diligence most hemp brands make impossible. A C (70/100) — unusually open about itself, including the parts it might rather hide. The full methodology shows every point; if Urb names its lab plainly and reconciles its sourcing claims, we'll update the file (see the notice below).
Questions, answered
Is Urb legit?
Yes — and it's one of the few hemp brands you can verify on a government website. Urb (Urb Finest Flowers) is made by Lifted Liquids, Inc. (Lifted Made), a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly traded, SEC-reporting company, so its ownership, finances, leadership, and lawsuits are all filed and audited. It also has strong lab-report access (a searchable portal plus a QR code on every package) and a BBB A+ accredited rating. We grade it a C (70/100): exceptional ownership transparency, held back by a sourcing story that contradicts itself, a lab named only inside the PDFs, and a settled class action over potency labeling.
Who owns Urb?
Urb is a brand (a d/b/a) of Lifted Liquids, Inc., which operates as Lifted Made and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of LFTD Partners Inc., a publicly traded company on the OTCQB market that files reports with the SEC. The subsidiary's CEO is Nicholas Warrender, who also holds roughly a 26% stake in the public parent — a fact disclosed in SEC filings. Because the parent is public, the entire ownership chain, the original acquisition terms, executive equity, and audited financials are all available in the SEC's EDGAR database, which is why Urb scores near the top of our category on ownership transparency.
Are Urb lab tests trustworthy?
On access, Urb is among the better brands: it runs a searchable COA portal, links reports from products, and prints a QR code on every package so you can pull the batch report at the shelf, with reports said to cover potency plus contaminants. The two caveats: the testing lab is named only inside the report PDFs rather than stated plainly, and a class action alleged that delta-9 potency in some vapes was underreported versus the label — it settled with no admission of liability. So the reports are easy to find; we'd just want the lab named up front and a clean labeling record. Always scan your specific batch's QR code.
What lawsuits has Urb been involved in?
Because Urb's parent is a public company, its litigation is disclosed in SEC filings. A federal class action alleged that delta-9 THC in certain Urb vapes was underreported relative to the label; per the filings it settled in early 2026 with no admission of liability. A separate RICO/consumer suit naming Lifted and its executives had its RICO claim dismissed with prejudice and the case dismissed, though the plaintiff has appealed, so it remains live. These are unproven allegations except where a disposition is stated. Separately, a 2018 FDA warning letter to the predecessor entity concerned a child-appealing e-liquid (a tobacco-vape matter) and was resolved; Urb was not named in the 2023 FDA/FTC delta-8 copycat sweep.
Is Urb's hemp grown in Oregon or indoors?
Frustratingly, Urb's own website says both, and that inconsistency is its weakest transparency point. One page (a FAQ) describes the flower as Oregon-grown, outdoor, sun-grown; another (a product collection page) describes American-grown flower produced with 'advanced indoor methods.' Those are different growing methods, and a buyer can't tell which is accurate. The cannabinoid raw-material suppliers also aren't named. None of this implies the product is unsafe — it's a sourcing-transparency miss, and a fixable one. We'd want a single, consistent, verifiable sourcing statement before raising this pillar.
How did you research this, and is it fair to Urb?
Most of this file is sourced to the parent company's own SEC filings — the strongest kind of public record — plus its BBB profile, the FDA database, and Urb's own website. We credited Urb's real, structural advantage: as a public company's subsidiary, it's far more auditable than the private LLCs that dominate this space. We described the litigation using the company's own disclosed dispositions and labeled plaintiff claims as allegations. We were careful not to attribute the 2023 FDA/FTC delta-8 sweep to Urb (it wasn't named), and we disambiguated an unrelated 'URB Cannabis' dispensary chain in Michigan. If Urb names its lab plainly and reconciles its sourcing claims, we'll update the file — see the notice at the foot of this page.